Florida Rewrites the AI in Higher Education Rulebook for 28 Colleges
Commissioner Henry Mack approved the proposed rule on August 24 and the Florida State Board of Education votes September 16, which leaves students who enrolled in 2024 finishing their degrees under integrity and grading rules written after they started.
Key Takeways
- Florida Education Commissioner Henry Mack approved the proposed rule on August 24, 2026, and the Florida State Board of Education votes on it September 16 at Polk State College in Winter Haven.
- All 28 Florida College System institutions would have to adopt policies covering AI use and limits, academic integrity and dishonesty, and how AI intersects with course assignments and grading.
- The rule restricts AI systems that simulate friendships or use anthropomorphic features to encourage continued interaction, placing companion-style apps outside what a Florida college may adopt.
- Students who enrolled in 2024 and 2025 will graduate under rules written after they started, which is the four-year bet with its terms revised mid-degree.
Watch any student who started an associate degree at a Florida public college last fall. She will finish that degree under academic integrity rules written after she enrolled, in courses whose AI policy shifted somewhere between her second semester and her fourth. She had no say in the change, and no vote on it.
On Monday, August 24, 2026, Florida Education Commissioner Henry Mack approved a proposed rule requiring all 28 institutions in the Florida College System to adopt formal AI policies. The Florida State Board of Education takes it up on September 16 at Polk State College in Winter Haven. If it passes, AI in higher education across an entire state system stops being a syllabus-by-syllabus improvisation and becomes written institutional policy with a name attached to it.
The rule tells each college what its policy has to cover. Use and limitations of AI tools for students, staff, and campus guests. Academic integrity and academic dishonesty. How AI intersects with course assignments and grading. The rule also restricts AI systems that simulate friendships or use anthropomorphic features designed to keep a user coming back, which places companion-style apps outside what a Florida college may adopt or endorse.
The rule states its own purpose plainly:
"The purpose of this rule is to require Florida College System institutions to adopt policies that provide for the use and limitations of use of artificial intelligence tools ... to ensure quality of education for students, efficiency of operations, and a safe learning environment for the whole college community."
The terms are changing while students are already holding the bet
A degree is a wager. A student puts in 2 or 4 years and money she often borrowed, against an institution's promise that what she learns will still be worth something on the day she walks out. Call it the four-year bet. The institution places that wager on her behalf, using a curriculum designed before she applied, aimed at a job market nobody in the building can describe with any confidence.
Florida's rule lands in the middle of that wager. The 28 colleges will rewrite academic integrity and grading for people who enrolled in 2024 and 2025, people who will graduate under rules their first-year selves never read. The four-year bet gets its terms revised at halftime. The same pressure runs through curriculum half-life: the distance between the day a course is designed and the day its assumptions expire keeps shrinking, and students are the ones standing in that distance. They pay for it in tuition and in time.
This is the through-line in most of what I write about AI in education. Institutions make long promises inside short cycles, then discover the promise and the cycle have come apart.
Florida is doing specific work while much of the sector is still writing principles
Give the Florida Department of Education credit for the shape of this. Plenty of institutions have published AI principles, thoughtful documents about responsible use that bind nobody and change no syllabus. Florida is requiring 28 separate colleges to produce enforceable policy on the three things faculty actually argue about at 9 p.m. on a Sunday: which tools a student may use, what counts as dishonesty, and how the work gets graded. Commissioner Mack put a date on it. The Florida State Board of Education put a public meeting behind it. That kind of specificity is rare anywhere in the country.
Rule-making at the system level also does something a single campus policy never can. A student who transfers from Tallahassee to Fort Myers carries one set of expectations instead of 28 different ones. Transfer students feel this first. An adjunct teaching at 2 colleges works from a common standard. Employers hiring Florida graduates get a coherent answer about what those graduates were permitted to use. Coordination like that is the hard part of public education, and Florida is attempting it on a 3-week clock.
The work that starts on September 16 needs people who have done it before
Writing the mandate is the fast part. Implementation is where policies like this live or die, and it will land on department chairs, faculty senates, and academic integrity officers who did not ask for a new policy portfolio in the middle of a term. Those people have 3 weeks of warning and a semester already underway. I advise the California State University system's AI working group and hold an Innovator-in-Residence appointment at Tulane University, and the same question surfaces in every one of those conversations: who owns the rewrite, and what do we owe the student caught in the interval?
Two questions worth carrying into your own institution's next meeting, whether or not you sit in Florida. Which of your courses would need a redesigned assessment if AI use were fully permitted tomorrow, and which would need one if it were fully prohibited? And who on your campus is accountable when a student follows last year's syllabus and violates this year's policy?
Purdue took a different route with its AI graduation requirement, building forward-looking curriculum for students who have yet to arrive. Florida is working the other end of the same problem, for students already in the middle of it. Both are serious attempts. Only one of them has a vote scheduled for September 16.
The student from the first paragraph will graduate with a transcript that says nothing about which semester the rules changed. She will carry the habits she built either way. Florida is making a real attempt to settle what those habits should be before she finishes, which is more than most systems have attempted, and the September 16 vote is worth watching closely. If someone asked your institution to produce its AI policy this week, what would the document say?
Does Florida's AI rule apply to state universities as well as colleges?
The proposed rule covers the 28 institutions of the Florida College System, the state's public colleges. Florida's public universities sit under the State University System, with its own governing structure, so they fall outside this rule. A university reading it as a preview of what may reach it later would be reading it right.
When does Florida's AI policy for colleges take effect?
The Florida State Board of Education votes on September 16, 2026. Adoption starts the clock for the colleges rather than ending it. Each of the 28 colleges then has to draft, approve, and publish its own policy. The date a student sees new syllabus language will vary by campus.
What should a college AI policy cover beyond academic integrity?
The rule leaves four practical items to each institution. A disclosure standard that tells a student how to state what AI did on an assignment. An appeals path for a student accused of misuse. A syllabus template so course-level rules stay consistent across departments. And a fixed annual review date, so the policy gets revisited on a schedule rather than after an incident.
Here is what makes Alex a credible voice on this topic: Alex advises the California State University system's AI Working Group and holds an Innovator-in-Residence appointment at Tulane University. That puts him inside the same integrity, grading, and implementation questions Florida's 28 colleges take up after the September 16 vote.
Working on your institution's AI policy and want a second read before it reaches your trustees? Get in touch →
.svg)
